A Modest Proposal or Two  

(Fellatio Superwoman?)


      I have two scientific proposals, one basically low-tech, and one involving cutting edge technology.  They have little in common except that each, if implemented, might be construed as social engineering - dangerous when done by politicians or sociologists, but perhaps of value when performed by the scientific/intellectual elite.  I'll cover the low tech proposal first.

 To begin, we need to find a small group (20 - 30) of low income (white trailer trash would do nicely) expecting mothers who are (a) quite attractive and show past performance of producing attractive children and (b) would be willing, for a modest fee, to surrender their female child for the furtherance of science.  Next, take these newborn infants away from their birth mothers and insure that they are fed formula only from "bottles" shaped like the adult human penis.  As the children develop into the crawling stage, "penis feeders" would be mounted to the walls of their cages.  Of course the formula would change to meet their developing nutritional needs, but no human contact, language development or socialization would be allowed.  At an appropriate point, air bladders in their "penis feeders" would inflate to simulate erection, so that the children learn that a period of sucking is required before they are rewarded with food.  No other source of food is allowed.  At about 5 -6 years of age the girls would be taught to defecate in one corner of their cage, and at about 10 - 12 years of age would be slowly introduced to their human handlers, but again, no language or socialization skills are taught.  At about 13 - 14 years of age the really interesting part of the experiment begins : the girls are lead on a leash out of their cage for "private feedings" with select staff members.  These men take careful notes comparing the fellatio skills of the test subjects to a control adult female group (probably prostitutes).  If the young girls' skills compare favorably, then they could be shipped to government research laboratories and housed in cages identical to the ones they were raised in.  "Private feedings" would be used as a performance incentive for the best programmers, nuclear scientists, geneticists, engineers, etc.  Such an incentive program might be just what's needed to restore the prestige of the scientific professions in this country and to lessen the flow of students into socially useless professions like law, sociology, and business administration.  If nothing else, from a purely scientific point of view, I think it would be interesting to see whether the experiment could yield "fellatio superwomen."
   The second proposal is much broader in scope, and its feasibility depends, in part, on the successful completion of the Human Genome Project.  The idea in a nutshell is this: All pregnant women would be required to report before the 3rd month of pregnancy to a public health clinic where an in utero examination of the fetus' genetic material is conducted.  Any red flags raised by the test (likelihood of fatal disease, likelihood of mental retardation, etc) would mean destruction of the fetus.  This would also be the perfect time to cross match the mother with information from previous IQ tests, criminal justice system files, demographic data, etc.  Gradually, as not to arouse suspicions, mothers with low IQ scores , criminal histories, or even just the wrong demographics would be presented with bogus test results indicating that their fetus must be destroyed.  This could only have a beneficial effect on society, with minimal inconvenience to the population.  And last but not least, this would also be a logical point to implement population control, the one topic our spineless shit politicians won't face.  
     Oh well, more about that later. 

                                                                                                                  George Kranz